I THINK :
FORCING ANYONE TO LIVE WITHOUT HIS/HER CONSCIOUS PARTICIPATION AND DESIRE IS A CRIME .
OF COURSE , ' TERMINAL ILLNESS ' IS NOW A DAYS, A MODERN TECH. IN ADVANCED CIVILIZATION TO KEEP ONE ALIVE (SUSPENDED LIFE ) AND EXTRACT FINANCIAL BENEFIT OR PROFIT !
" WHOSE LIFE IS IT , ANYWAY "
=====================================================================
FORCING ANYONE TO LIVE WITHOUT HIS/HER CONSCIOUS PARTICIPATION AND DESIRE IS A CRIME .
OF COURSE , ' TERMINAL ILLNESS ' IS NOW A DAYS, A MODERN TECH. IN ADVANCED CIVILIZATION TO KEEP ONE ALIVE (SUSPENDED LIFE ) AND EXTRACT FINANCIAL BENEFIT OR PROFIT !
" WHOSE LIFE IS IT , ANYWAY "
=====================================================================
See realtime coverage |
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday did not shy away from taking up for adjudication the emotive issue of permitting removal of life support system from a person on the deathbed if doctors unanimously agree that there is no chance of survival.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment